Home › Clinical Trials Tracker

Clinical Trials Tracker

A comprehensive guide to active and completed clinical trials for Placenta Accreta Spectrum patients — helping you understand what research is underway and how to participate.

Last reviewed: March 2026

Key Takeaways

  • Only 2 US-based trials are actively recruiting PAS patients as of early 2026
  • The University of Utah has the only US-based randomized trial comparing conservative management to hysterectomy
  • The majority of interventional PAS trials are based in Egypt, reflecting higher surgical volume there
  • Conservative management (leaving the placenta in place to be reabsorbed) is the dominant research theme across active trials
2
US Trials Actively Recruiting
1
US Randomized Trial (Utah)
16+
PAS-Related Trials Worldwide
0
Large Multicenter US RCTs

US-Based Trials (Most Relevant)#

These are the trials most accessible to patients in the United States. Of the three listed, only two are currently recruiting participants.

NCT06512181 — U-PRESERVE

Status: RECRUITING

Site: Penn Medicine PAS Center of Excellence, Philadelphia, PA

Approach: Conservative/expectant management — the placenta is left in situ (in place) after delivery and monitored as it is reabsorbed by the body, with the goal of avoiding hysterectomy and preserving the uterus.

Size: 15 participants

Started: 2024

Eligibility:

  • Age 18 or older
  • 16–36 weeks pregnant
  • Diagnosed with PAS
  • Desire for uterine preservation
  • Prior cesarean delivery

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

NCT05139498 — Conservative Management Pilot

Status: RECRUITING

Site: University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

Approach: The only US-based randomized trial comparing conservative management (leaving the placenta in situ) versus planned cesarean hysterectomy (surgical removal of the uterus at delivery). This is the gold-standard study design for comparing treatments.

PI: Brett Einerson, MD (brett.einerson@hsc.utah.edu)

Funding: NICHD K23HD106009

Eligibility:

  • Prior cesarean delivery
  • Placenta previa (placenta covering the cervix) or low-lying placenta
  • Suspected PAS on imaging
  • Planned delivery at 34–36 weeks

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

NCT04671680 — CNAP vs IABP

Status: ACTIVE, NOT RECRUITING

Site: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA

Approach: Observational study comparing non-invasive blood pressure monitoring (CNAP) versus invasive arterial line monitoring (IABP) during PAS surgery. This is not a treatment trial, but its findings will inform anesthesia practice for PAS deliveries.

PI: John J. Kowalczyk, MD

Note: While not a treatment trial, understanding optimal monitoring during PAS surgery is important for improving surgical outcomes and patient safety.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

International Conservative Management Trials#

Conservative management — leaving the placenta in situ after delivery rather than performing immediate hysterectomy — is the most actively studied approach worldwide. The majority of these trials are based in Egypt, where higher PAS surgical volume provides larger study populations.

Status: Recruiting

Location: Egypt

Description: Evaluates the safety and efficacy of conservative management in PAS patients, with outcomes including uterine preservation rates, blood loss, and complication rates.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Status: Recruiting

Location: Egypt

Description: Prospective study examining outcomes of expectant management in PAS, tracking time to placental resorption, complication rates, and need for secondary intervention.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Status: Active

Location: France

Description: Multicenter French study evaluating conservative treatment protocols for PAS, including methotrexate use and uterine artery embolization as adjunctive therapies to support placental resorption.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Status: Completed

Location: Egypt

Description: Study of conservative management outcomes in confirmed PAS cases, including uterine preservation success rates and maternal morbidity data.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Surgical Technique Trials#

These trials investigate specific surgical approaches designed to reduce blood loss and complications during cesarean hysterectomy or uterine-preserving surgery for PAS.

Status: Recruiting

Location: Egypt

Description: Evaluates the “N&H Sandwich” surgical technique, which combines compression sutures with intrauterine balloon tamponade to control hemorrhage during PAS surgery while potentially preserving the uterus.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Status: Completed

Location: Egypt

Description: Studied a double-incision surgical approach for cesarean delivery in PAS patients, where the uterine incision is placed away from the placental site to reduce blood loss during delivery.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Status: Recruiting

Location: Egypt

Description: Evaluates a modified version of the Triple-P procedure — Perioperative placental localization, Pelvic devascularization (reducing blood flow), and Placental non-separation with myometrial excision — as a uterine-preserving approach for PAS.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Diagnostic & Imaging Trials#

Improving how PAS is detected and classified before delivery is critical for surgical planning and outcomes. These trials focus on validating diagnostic tools.

Status: Active

Description: Prospective validation of the Placenta Accreta Index (PAI), a scoring system that uses ultrasound findings to predict the severity of placental invasion. A validated scoring system would help standardize PAS diagnosis and guide surgical planning.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Status: Active

Description: Further evaluation of the Placenta Accreta Index in clinical settings, assessing its predictive value for surgical outcomes and its utility in multidisciplinary team planning for PAS deliveries.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Fertility Outcomes#

For patients who wish to have more children after a PAS pregnancy, understanding fertility outcomes is essential. Research in this area remains limited.

Status: Active

Description: Longitudinal study tracking fertility outcomes in women who experienced PAS, including time to conception, pregnancy rates, recurrence of PAS in subsequent pregnancies, and obstetric outcomes. This study addresses a significant gap in the literature, as most PAS research focuses on the index pregnancy rather than long-term reproductive outcomes.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Related Hemorrhage Trials#

Massive hemorrhage (heavy bleeding) is the primary risk during PAS surgery. These trials investigate treatments to reduce blood loss, and while not PAS-specific, their findings directly impact PAS surgical management.

Status: Recruiting

Description: Investigates the use of tranexamic acid (TXA) — a medication that helps blood clot — specifically in PAS patients to reduce intraoperative blood loss during cesarean delivery. TXA is already widely used in postpartum hemorrhage, and this trial aims to establish its role in the PAS-specific surgical setting.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Status: Completed

Description: The only completed randomized controlled trial (RCT) to include PAS patients in a study of tranexamic acid. TAPPAS evaluated the efficacy of prophylactic TXA in reducing blood loss during cesarean delivery for patients with abnormally invasive placenta. Results from this trial provide the strongest existing evidence for TXA use in PAS.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Emerging Research (NICHD & Beyond)#

Beyond registered clinical trials, several research initiatives are shaping the future of PAS care.

📌 NICHD PAS Workshop — June 2024

The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) convened a workshop in June 2024 to define research priorities for PAS. Key findings emphasized the need for standardized diagnostic criteria, multicenter registries, and randomized trials comparing management strategies. The workshop proceedings have been published (PMID: 40311146).1

Active Research Initiatives

  • Baylor College of Medicine: Developing new contrast agents for earlier and more accurate detection of PAS via imaging. Early detection remains a major factor in improving outcomes.
  • University of Connecticut: Awarded a $2.5 million R01 grant to study the molecular mechanisms underlying abnormal placental invasion in PAS. Understanding why PAS occurs at the cellular level could lead to targeted therapies or prevention strategies.
  • Cost-effectiveness of conservative management: A 2025 study published in BJOG analyzed the economic implications of conservative management versus immediate hysterectomy, providing data that may influence both clinical practice and insurance coverage decisions.2

How to Participate in a Clinical Trial#

✅ Steps to Explore Trial Participation
  • Talk to your MFM specialist (Maternal-Fetal Medicine doctor) about whether any active trials match your clinical situation and eligibility criteria.
  • Visit ClinicalTrials.gov and search for “placenta accreta” to see the most current list of registered trials.
  • Important: Most trials require delivery at the trial site. If a trial interests you, discuss the logistics of transferring care with both your current provider and the trial site.
  • Clinical trial participation is always voluntary. You can withdraw at any time without affecting your standard care.

Research Gaps#

⚠️ Significant Gaps in PAS Research

Despite growing interest in PAS, critical research gaps remain:

  • No large-scale multicenter US randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing conservative management to surgical management. The University of Utah pilot is a critical first step, but a definitive multicenter trial is needed.
  • No trial addressing the psychological impact of PAS on patients and families. PAS diagnoses cause significant anxiety, grief, and trauma — yet no registered trial studies mental health outcomes or interventions.
  • No randomized US trial for interventional radiology (IR) balloon occlusion — a widely used technique where balloons are placed in pelvic arteries to reduce blood loss during PAS surgery. Despite routine use at many centers, its efficacy has never been evaluated in a US randomized trial.

References#

  1. NICHD Placenta Accreta Spectrum Workshop Proceedings. 2024. PMID: 40311146
  2. Cost-effectiveness of conservative management versus hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum. BJOG. 2025. PubMed
  3. ClinicalTrials.gov. U-PRESERVE: Uterine Preservation in PAS. NCT06512181
  4. ClinicalTrials.gov. Conservative Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Pilot Trial. NCT05139498
  5. ClinicalTrials.gov. CNAP vs IABP in PAS Surgery. NCT04671680
  6. ClinicalTrials.gov. Conservative Management of PAS (Egypt). NCT05013749
  7. ClinicalTrials.gov. Expectant Management Outcomes in PAS. NCT05232981
  8. ClinicalTrials.gov. Conservative Treatment of PAS (France). NCT03273569
  9. ClinicalTrials.gov. Placenta Accreta Conservative Management. NCT03327818
  10. ClinicalTrials.gov. N&H Sandwich Technique for PAS. NCT03701386
  11. ClinicalTrials.gov. Double Incision Technique for PAS. NCT02702024
  12. ClinicalTrials.gov. Modified Triple-P Procedure for PAS. NCT04384510
  13. ClinicalTrials.gov. Placenta Accreta Index Validation. NCT04314791
  14. ClinicalTrials.gov. Placenta Accreta Index in Clinical Practice. NCT05513092
  15. ClinicalTrials.gov. Fertility Post Placenta Accreta. NCT02821702
  16. ClinicalTrials.gov. TRAPP — Tranexamic Acid in PAS. NCT05811676
  17. ClinicalTrials.gov. TAPPAS — TXA for Placenta Accreta Spectrum. NCT02806024
⚠️ Medical Disclaimer

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical trial information may change; always verify current status on ClinicalTrials.gov and consult with your healthcare team before making decisions about trial participation.